NCERT Solutions for Class 9 Social Science Civics Chapter 5 Democratic Rights Questions and Answers

NCERT Solutions for Class 9 Social Science Civics Chapter 5 “Democratic Rights” offer comprehensive and accurate answers to the questions presented in the chapter. These solutions provide a deep understanding of democratic principles and the importance of individual rights in a society. With concise explanations and relevant examples, students can grasp the concepts of fundamental rights, freedom of speech, equality, and more. These solutions serve as a valuable resource for Class 9 students to enhance their knowledge and excel in their social science studies.

NCERT Solutions for Class 9 Social Science Civics Chapter 5 Democratic Rights Questions and Answers

Q1. Which of the following is not an instance of an exercise of a fundamental right?
(a) Workers from Bihar go to the Punjab to work on the farms
(b) Christian missions set up a chain of missionary schools
(c) Men and women government employees get the same salary
(d) Parents’ property is inherited by their children

Answer.
(d) Parents’ property is inherited by their children

Q2. Which of the following freedoms is not available to an Indian citizen?
(a) Freedom to criticise the government
(b) Freedom to participate in armed revolution
(c) Freedom to start a movement to change the government
(d) Freedom to oppose the central values of the Constitution

Answer:
(b) Freedom to participate in armed revolution

3. Which of the following rights is available under the Indian Constitution?
(a) Right to work
(b) Right to adequate livelihood
(c) Right to protect one’s culture
(d) Right to privacy

Answer:
(c) Right to protect one’s culture

4. Name the Fundamental Right under which each of the following rights falls:

(a) Freedom to propagate one’s religion

(b) Right to life

(c) Abolition of untouchability

(d) Ban on bonded labour

Answer:

(a) Right to freedom of religion

(b) Right to freedom

(c) Right to equality

(d) Right against exploitation

5. Which of these statements about the relationship between democracy and rights is more valid? Give reasons for your preference.

(a) Every country that is a democracy gives rights to its citizens.

(b) Every country that gives rights to its citizens is a democracy.

(c) Giving rights is good, but it is not necessary for a democracy.

Answer:

The most valid statement is (a).

This is because every country that is democratic is a system wherein the government is elected by the people. Therefore, it is essential for it to provide rights to its citizens.

6. Are these restrictions on the right to freedom justified? Give reasons for your answer.

  1. Indian citizens need permission to visit some border areas of the country for reasons of security.
  2. Outsiders are not allowed to buy property in some areas to protect the interest of the local population.
  3. The government bans the publication of a book that can go against the ruling party in the next elections.

Answer:

  1. This statement is justified as the citizens are protected from loss of life or property.
  2. This statement is not justified as it infringes on the right to freedom of citizens from other parts of the country.
  3. This statement is not justified as it violates the right to freedom of speech and expression.

7. Manoj went to a college to apply for admission into an MBA course. The clerk refused to take his application and said You, the son of a sweeper, wish to be a manager! Has anyone done this job in your community? Go to the municipality office and apply for a sweeper’s position. Which of Manoj’s fundamental rights is being violated in this instance? Spell these out in a letter from Manoj to the district collector.

Answer: 

Manoj’s right to freedom is being violated in this scenario. The Right to Freedom guarantees every citizen the freedom to pursue any profession or engage in any trade, business, or occupation. This implies that no one can be coerced into taking or refraining from a particular job. Therefore, individuals from lower castes or deprived backgrounds cannot be confined to their traditional occupations.

8. When Madhurima went to the property registration office, the Registrar told her. “You can’t write your name as Madhurima Banerjee d/o A. K. Banerjee. You are married, so you must give your husband’s name. Your husband’s surname is Rao. So your name should be changed to Madhurima Rao.” She did not agree. She said “If my husband’s name has not changed after marriage, why should mine?” In your opinion who is right in this dispute? And why?
Answer:
In this dispute, Madhurima’s opinion is correct as Madhurima has got all the right to retain her maiden name to ensure gender equality. In a democratic country like India, every citizen enjoys the right to equality. Therefore, whether it is the marital status or unmarried a girl has all the right to retain her father’s name.

9. Thousands of tribals and other forest dwellers gathered at Piparia in the Hoshangabad district in Madhya Pradesh to protest against their proposed displacement from the Satpura National Park, Bori Wildlife Sanctuary, and Panchmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary. They argue that such a displacement is an attack on their livelihood and beliefs. The government claims that their displacement is essential for the development of the area and for protection of wildlife. Write a petition on behalf of the forest dwellers to the NHRC, a response from the government, and a report of the NHRC on this matter.
Answer:
As the answers may vary, please attempt this question on your own with the help of your subject teacher or elders.

Example:

Petition to the NHRC on Behalf of the Forest Dwellers

To: The National Human Rights Commission

We, the forest dwellers of the Satpura National Park, Bori Wildlife Sanctuary, and Panchmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary, write to express our deep concern and opposition to the proposed displacement of our communities from these areas.

For generations, we have lived in harmony with nature and relied on the forests for our livelihoods, cultural practices, and traditions. Our displacement from these areas would not only be an attack on our basic rights but would also lead to the destruction of our way of life.

We strongly urge the NHRC to intervene and protect our rights as forest dwellers. We request that the NHRC conducts an independent investigation into the government’s proposed displacement plan and ensure that our voices are heard.

Response from the Government

To: The Forest Dwellers of the Satpura National Park, Bori Wildlife Sanctuary, and Panchmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary

The government has taken note of your concerns regarding the proposed displacement from the Satpura National Park, Bori Wildlife Sanctuary, and Panchmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary. We understand that this may cause disruption to your traditional livelihoods and cultural practices.

However, the displacement plan is essential for the development of the area and for the protection of wildlife. The forests in these areas are home to several endangered species, and their protection is of utmost importance.

We assure you that the government will provide appropriate compensation and rehabilitation to all affected forest dwellers.

Report of the NHRC on the Matter

To: The National Human Rights Commission

The NHRC conducted an investigation into the proposed displacement of forest dwellers from the Satpura National Park, Bori Wildlife Sanctuary, and Panchmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary.

The NHRC found that the displacement plan would indeed cause severe disruption to the traditional livelihoods and cultural practices of the forest dwellers. Furthermore, the government’s compensation and rehabilitation plans were inadequate and failed to address the long-term impact of displacement on these communities.

The NHRC recommends that the government reconsider its displacement plan and engage in a meaningful dialogue with the forest dwellers to find a solution that protects both the rights of the forest dwellers and the environment.

Q10. Draw a web interconnecting different rights discussed in this chapter. For example right to freedom of movement is connected to the freedom of occupation. One reason for this is that freedom of movement enables a person to go to place of work within one’s village or city or to another village, city or state. Similarly this right can be used for pilgrimage, connected with freedom to follow one’s religion. Draw a circle for each right and mark arrows that show connection between or among different rights. For each arrow, give an example that shows the linkage.

Leave a Reply